Which of the following is NOT a lawful excuse for failing to perform contractual obligations?
Which TWO of the following are tests that should be met when determining whether damages are too remote to be claimed?
(1) Losses must be connected in some way to the breach of contract
(2) Losses must arise naturally from the breach of contract
(3) Losses related to exceptional circumstances are too remote to be claimed
(4) Losses arising outside the normal course of events will be compensated if the circumstances are within the defendant's knowledge when they formed to contract
In relation to the law of contract, which of the following statements in relation to damages is correct?
Which of the following statements in relation to liquidated damages is correct?