筛选结果 共找出36

State whether the fight organiser has any defence to a negligence claim by Rodger

State whether the train station has any defence to a negligence claim by Lulu 

The 'neighbour' principle was established by the landmark case 

A

 Caparo v Dickman 1990 

B

Anns v Merton London Borough Council 1977 

C

 Donoghue v Stevenson 1932 

D

 The Wagon Mound 1961 

When the court applies the maxim res ipsa loquitur, it is held that the facts speak for themselves and the defendant does not have to prove anything, since the burden of proof is on the claimant.  

A

True 

B

False

Under which circumstance will a court reduce the award of damages to a claimant? 

A

The claimant intervened in the chain of causality 

B

 A natural event occurred which caused additional damage 

C

 The claimant contributed to the loss they suffered 

D

The defendant acknowledged they were to blame 

'A public company's auditors owe no general duty of care to the public at large who rely on the audit report in deciding to invest.'   

This is the decision from Caparo. 

A

True 

B

False 

In the context of the tort of negligence, what is the legal effect of res ipsa loquitur?

A

The claimant must prove that they acted reasonably

B

The claimant must prove that the defendant was negligent

C

The defendant must prove that they were not negligent

To establish a case of 'passing-off', what must the claimant prove?

A

There is some similarity between the name of the defendant's business and that of the claimant

B

The defendant is using a similar business model to the claimant

C

The consumer purchased fake goods

D

The name of the defendant’s business is similar enough to the claimant's to mislead the consumer

Which of the following statements concerning tort is correct? 

A

Breach of contract is a tort 

B

 Torts are crimes 

C

 A tort is a civil wrong and the victim sues for compensation or an injunction 

 Which of the following describes the tort of 'passing-off'? 

A

 The use of a business name or trademark that misleads the consumer to believe that one business is that of another 

B

Misleading a consumer to take actions that are to their detriment 

C

 A consumer deliberately wearing a product that purports to be made by one brand but which is actually a fake